DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 3.6 points higher (39.6 vs 36.0) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $1122; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 39.6 | +10.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 10.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $1,385.40 | +23.4% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 23.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 20.85s | −19.4% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 19.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 10.0% more intelligence, 23.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill