DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 16.4 points higher (52.4 vs 36.0) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1122; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.0, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 52.4 | +45.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 45.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $5,786.78 | +415.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 5.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 40.70s | +57.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 57.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 45.6% more intelligence, 415.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill