DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 40.6% less intelligence, 2.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 330.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 21.4 | −40.6% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 40.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $1,145.36 | +2.1% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 2.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.88s | 111.39s | +330.4% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 330.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill