DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Qwen3.7 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 18.1% less intelligence, 102.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 29.5 | −18.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 18.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $2,277.12 | +102.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 16.57s | −35.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 35.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill