DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 25.2 points higher (36.0 vs 10.8) but costs 4.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $233; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 10.8 | −70.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 70.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $232.95 | −79.2% Trinity Large Thinking is 79.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 8.25s | −68.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 68.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 70.0% less intelligence, 79.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill