DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Ef… scores 25.4 points higher (36.3 vs 10.9) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $518; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Ef… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.3 | 10.9 | −70.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 70.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $518.07 | −53.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 53.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.92s | 8.78s | −73.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 73.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort): 70.0% less intelligence, 53.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill