Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchExaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.30
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 3.1 Instruct 70BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricExaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning)Llama 3.1 Instruct 70BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.36.6+24.5% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 24.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported14.51s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.56 / $0.56
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerExaone 4.0 1.2B (Reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-1-2b-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-70b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-1-2b-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-70b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill