Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

Exaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchExaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.20
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 3.3 Instruct 70BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricExaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning)Llama 3.3 Instruct 70BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.27.7+48.1% Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B is 48.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported7.43s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.66 / $0.71
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerExaone 4.0 1.2B (Non-reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.3 Instruct 70B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-1-2b/llama-3-3-instruct-70b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-1-2b/llama-3-3-instruct-70b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill