EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs o3-mini (High)

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs o3-mini (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.20
Total cost
-
OpenAIo3-mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
11.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)o3-mini (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.211.0+34.1% o3-mini (High) is 34.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported17.63s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$1.10 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): what beats ito3-mini (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning/o3-mini-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning/o3-mini-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill