EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Max. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 MaxNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Qwen2.5 MaxDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.28.0−2.4% Qwen2.5 Max is 2.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): what beats itQwen2.5 Max: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning/qwen-2-5-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning/qwen-2-5-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill