EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.20
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
9.20
Total cost
$405
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.29.2+12.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 12.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$405.10— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported6.44s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.31 / $1.00
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3 Coder Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill