EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
MetaMuse Spark 1.3 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
48.10
Total cost
$2000
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.348.1+663.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 7.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,000.35— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported67.10s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$1.25 / $4.25
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): what beats itMuse Spark 1.3 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill