EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.37.2+14.3% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 14.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported90.84s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerEXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-0-32b/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill