EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)

EXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.20
Total cost
-
GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)On the open-weights frontier
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
$14.7
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricEXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.28.9−32.6% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 32.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$14.68— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported57.75s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.02 / $0.10
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerEXAONE 4.5 33B (Reasoning): what beats itGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-5-33b/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/exaone-4-5-33b/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill