Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4.1 nano. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4.1 nanoNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)GPT-4.1 nanoDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.17.8−40.5% GPT-4.1 nano is 40.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)17.17s2.87s−83.3% GPT-4.1 nano is 83.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$0.10 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): what beats itGPT-4.1 nano: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-4-1-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-4-1-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill