Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 Turbo
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4 Turbo. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) | GPT-4 Turbo | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 7.0 | −46.6% GPT-4 Turbo is 46.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.17s | 18.13s | +5.6% GPT-4 Turbo is 5.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $10.0 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-4-turbo · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-4-turbo?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill