Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4o mini
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-4o mini. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) | GPT-4o mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 6.7 | −48.9% GPT-4o mini is 48.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.54s | 6.32s | −69.2% GPT-4o mini is 69.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-4o-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-4o-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill