Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Medium)
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 nano (Medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) | GPT-5 nano (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 12.5 | −4.6% GPT-5 nano (Medium) is 4.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 17.75s | 40.57s | +128.6% GPT-5 nano (Medium) is 128.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.05 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-5-nano-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/gpt-5-nano-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill