Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8-Flash-NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
39.80
Total cost
$363
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.139.8+203.8% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 3.0× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$362.72— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)17.75s50.49s+184.5% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 184.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$0.15 / $0.47
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning): what beats itQwen3.8-Flash-Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill