Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 13.1 | 45.4 | +246.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 3.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $4,934.79 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.64s | 64.05s | +226.1% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 226.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-reasoning/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill