Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4 Turbo

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-4 Turbo. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-4 TurboNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-4 TurboDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.97.0−29.3% GPT-4 Turbo is 29.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.89s18.13s+527.3% GPT-4 Turbo is 527.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$10.0 / $30.0
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itGPT-4 Turbo: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/gpt-4-turbo · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/gpt-4-turbo?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill