Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 14B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.96.4−35.4% Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) is 35.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.89s32.20s+1014.2% Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) is 1014.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$0.12 / $0.24
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 14B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-14b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-14b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill