Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.912.0+21.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 21.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.91s9.71s+233.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 233.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$0.21 / $0.84
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill