Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
9.20
Total cost
$405
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.99.2−7.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 7.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$405.10— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.85s6.22s+118.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 118.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$0.31 / $1.00
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itQwen3 Coder Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill