Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.9 | 9.6 | −3.0% Qwen3 Next 80B A3B In… is 3.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.89s | 4.52s | +56.4% Qwen3 Next 80B A3B In… is 56.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.10 / $1.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill