Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.90
Total cost
-
ReflectionBeam 1.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.30
Total cost
$319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)9.930.3+206.1% Beam 1.0 is 3.1× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$318.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.86s8.02s+180.4% Beam 1.0 is 180.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.50$0.40 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itBeam 1.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-flash/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill