Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) scores 8.0 points higher (24.1 vs 16.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1524 vs $823; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 24.1 | +49.7% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 49.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $1,524.02 | +85.2% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 85.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 109.06s | +290.3% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 290.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 49.7% more intelligence, 85.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 290.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProGPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill