Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 14.9% more intelligence, 97.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 18.5 | +14.9% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 14.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $19.16 | −97.7% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 97.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.16s | 5.09s | −83.1% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 83.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Gemini 2.5 ProGPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill