Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 9.7 points higher (25.8 vs 16.1) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 25.8 | +60.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 60.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $992.88 | +20.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 20.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 46.75s | +72.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 72.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 60.2% more intelligence, 20.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 2.5 ProKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill