Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 135.4% more intelligence, 86.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 37.9 | +135.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $109.55 | −86.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 86.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 49.53s | +82.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 82.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 2.5 ProMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill