Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 10.1 points higher (16.1 vs 6.0) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 6.0 | −62.7% Ministral 3 14B is 62.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $37.56 | −95.4% Ministral 3 14B is 95.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 6.97s | −74.3% Ministral 3 14B is 74.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 62.7% less intelligence, 95.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 2.5 ProMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill