Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 11.3 points higher (16.1 vs 4.8) but costs 67× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $12.2; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 4.8 | −70.2% Ministral 3 3B is 70.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $12.23 | −98.5% Ministral 3 3B is 98.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 3.07s | −88.7% Ministral 3 3B is 88.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 70.2% less intelligence, 98.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Gemini 2.5 ProMinistral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill