Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) scores 29.0 points higher (45.1 vs 16.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1655 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 45.1 | +180.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $1,655.27 | +101.2% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.37s | 30.45s | +11.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 11.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 180.1% more intelligence, 101.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProMuse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill