Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 36.3 points higher (52.4 vs 16.1) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $823; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 16.1, and Gemini 2.5 Pro when 16.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 52.4 | +225.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $5,786.78 | +603.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 7.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 43.73s | +56.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 56.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 225.5% more intelligence, 603.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 2.5 ProMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill