Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 6.9 points higher (16.1 vs 9.2) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $663; both premium class). Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 9.2 | −42.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 42.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $662.85 | −19.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 19.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.79s | 7.71s | −74.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 74.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.50 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.9% less intelligence, 19.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill