Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 21.4 points higher (37.0 vs 15.6) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $156; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.5 (High) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 37.0 | +137.2% GPT-5.5 (High) is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $3,410.76 | +2088.2% GPT-5.5 (High) is 22× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.09s | 19.56s | +221.2% GPT-5.5 (High) is 221.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 137.2% more intelligence, 2088.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 221.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill