Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 37.1 points higher (52.7 vs 15.6) but costs 34× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $156; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 52.7 | +237.8% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $5,324.10 | +3315.7% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 34× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.09s | 280.51s | +4506.1% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 4506.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 237.8% more intelligence, 3315.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 4506.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill