Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.6 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 28.7 points higher (44.3 vs 15.6) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (High) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.6 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 44.3 | +184.0% Grok 4.6 (High) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $1,962.90 | +1159.3% Grok 4.6 (High) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.08s | 34.90s | +474.0% Grok 4.6 (High) is 474.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (High) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 184.0% more intelligence, 1159.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 474.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGrok 4.6 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/grok-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/grok-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill