Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 14.5 points higher (30.1 vs 15.6) but costs 7.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 30.1 | +92.9% Kimi K3 (Low) is 92.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $1,190.42 | +663.7% Kimi K3 (Low) is 7.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 57.21s | +830.2% Kimi K3 (Low) is 830.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 92.9% more intelligence, 663.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 830.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteKimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill