Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 9.6 points higher (15.6 vs 6.0) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($156 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 6.0 | −61.5% Ministral 3 14B is 61.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $37.56 | −75.9% Ministral 3 14B is 75.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.05s | 8.05s | +33.1% Ministral 3 14B is 33.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 61.5% less intelligence, 75.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill