Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 23.3 points higher (38.9 vs 15.6) but costs 7.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 38.9 | +149.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $1,184.90 | +660.2% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 7.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.08s | 17.05s | +180.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 180.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 149.4% more intelligence, 660.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 180.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMuse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill