Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 36.8 points higher (52.4 vs 15.6) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $156; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 52.4 | +235.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $5,786.78 | +3612.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 37× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 40.70s | +561.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 561.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 235.9% more intelligence, 3612.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 561.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill