Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 10.9 points higher (26.5 vs 15.6) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 26.5 | +69.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 69.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $286.07 | +83.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 83.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.10s | 6.31s | +3.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 69.9% more intelligence, 83.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill