Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM-5.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Max) scores 15.1 points higher (44.8 vs 29.7) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2503 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GLM-5.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GLM-5.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 44.8 | +50.8% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 50.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $2,503.48 | +29.4% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 29.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.90s | 31.61s | +26.9% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 26.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Max) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 50.8% more intelligence, 29.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM-5.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/glm-5-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/glm-5-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill