Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 5.6 points higher (29.7 vs 24.1) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $1524; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh).
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 24.1 | −18.9% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 18.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $1,524.02 | −21.3% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 21.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.32s | 108.99s | +348.1% GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is 348.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.75 / $4.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 18.9% less intelligence, 21.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 348.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/gpt-5-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/gpt-5-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill