Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 12.2 points higher (29.7 vs 17.5) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 17.5 | −41.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 41.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $145.77 | −92.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 92.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.32s | 24.78s | +1.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 1.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 41.1% less intelligence, 92.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill