Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 8.3 points higher (29.7 vs 21.4) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $1145; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 21.4 | −27.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 27.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $1,145.36 | −40.8% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 40.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.90s | 112.14s | +350.4% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 350.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 27.9% less intelligence, 40.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 350.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill