Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores 10.2 points higher (39.9 vs 29.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2632 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 39.9 | +34.3% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 34.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $2,632.05 | +36.0% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 36.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 61.67s | +120.7% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 120.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 34.3% more intelligence, 36.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 120.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 2.4T A95BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill