Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 34.0% more intelligence, 81.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 101.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 39.8 | +34.0% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 34.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $362.72 | −81.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 81.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.04s | 50.49s | +101.6% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 101.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill