Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 15.7 points higher (45.4 vs 29.7) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 45.4 | +52.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 52.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $4,934.79 | +155.0% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.90s | 63.23s | +153.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 153.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 52.9% more intelligence, 155.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 153.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill